Hurricane Harvey, the first major hurricane (winds greater than 110mph) to make landfall in the United States since 2005, will go down as one of the wettest storm systems in United States history. Rainfall measured in feet inundated coastal Texas impacting millions.
This devastating storm had its origins thousands of miles from the Gulf Coast of Texas as a storm system that left the West African coast during the middle of August. But it took until the Bay of Campeche for the storm to get its act together. Taking advantage of the warm waters in the Gulf of Mexico and the lack of wind shear—changing of wind speed and/or direction with height in the atmosphere—Harvey rapidly strengthened as it set its sights on the Texas coastline.
At landfall near Rockport and Port Aransas, Texas, Harvey was still a strengthening Category 4 hurricane with 130-mph winds. It was the strongest storm to hit Texas since Hurricane Carla in 1961. The storm caused massive damage as it moved onshore, leveling buildings throughout Aransas County, leaving the city of Victoria without power or water, and destroying entire blocks in Rockport. But even then, Harvey’s streak of catastrophic damage was just getting started
The hurricane that refused to leave
Thanks to weak winds in the upper atmosphere that generally serve to steer tropical systems and a high pressure system to the north that blocked any escape, Harvey stalled over Texas for several days. This allowed for Harvey to tap into the warm Gulf of Mexico for a seemingly endless supply of water, which it turned into torrents of rain from Corpus Christi to Houston to Beaumont. The final rainfall numbers were staggering. To be quite honest, I’m still at a loss at even comprehending.
The highest rainfall amount totaled 48.20 inches at a rain gauge on Clear Creek and I-45 near Houston Texas. It was the highest rainfall amount in a single storm for any place in the continental United States. More than 6.7 million people in a 29,000 square mile area (the size of West Virginia) received at least 20 inches of rain in seven days. And a large area east of Houston observed 40 inches of rain. Houston observed two of its wettest five days ever on back to back days August 26 and 27. On August 26, more than 8 inches of rain was recorded. A day later, around 16 inches of rain fell. Two feet of rain fell in just two days!
At Houston’s Hobby airport, the three-day rainfall from August 26-28 was larger than the previous record for wettest 65-day period. Three of the airport’s 5 wettest days since 1930 happened during Harvey (August 26, 27, and 28). Not surprisingly, August was the wettest month on record for the city (39.11 inches), more than double the previous wettest month (19.21 inches).
As the storm slowly moved east, it brought its record-setting rains with it. Beaumont, TX, broke its record for wettest day on record on August 29 when over 26 inches of rain fell—more than double the previous record. August rains reached a total of 54.73 inches, more than three times the previous wettest August and almost 32 inches more than the previous all-time wettest month (November 1902).
How likely is an event like this?
One of the ways meteorologists gauge the intensity of extreme events is to describe them in terms of their frequency or probability, based on historical observations. For the estimates to be valid, of course, scientists need an up-to-date record of historical precipitation, and NOAA was in the midst of an update for the Texas precipitation frequency data when Harvey hit.
This means that an official analysis of whether rainfall amounts in Harvey were a 1-in-500-year event or 1-in-1000 will have to wait for the time being. However, Dr. Sanja Perica, chief of the National Weather Service’s Hydrometeorological Design Studies Center, has noted that preliminary estimates for the area suggest that some locations likely received rainfall amounts that have a 0.1 (one in a thousand) percent chance of occurring in any year.
Analysis from other groups also came to similar conclusion. As noted by the Washington Post, in an analysis of the highest one-day rainfall amounts done by Shane Hubbard of the University of Wisconsin, such a large amount of rain falling over a one-day period has a 0.1% chance of occurring in any given year. Analysis of the five-day rainfall amounts by the company MetSat found that five-day rainfall totals on par with Harvey’s had a 0.004% to 0.0002% chance of occurring in any given year.
If you’re curious how these sorts of numbers are calculated—and the caveats that must be taken into account—check out this past post that delves into the details.
[Images of heavy rains and floods in Houston, Texas after Hurricane Harvey in August 2017. Flooding is evident along the Brazos River south of Houston. NASA MODIS satellite images from Worldview.]
All that water meant huge floods
Houston and surrounding areas were quickly inundated as non-stop torrential rain raised river and creek levels to record highs across the region. The Harris County Flood Control District estimated that one trillion gallons of water fell in the county in four days. A meteorologist with the Harris County Flood Control District noted that it was estimated that 70% of the county was flooded by at least 1.5 feet of water. With the city quickly filling with water, thousands of people had to be rescued from their homes. The flooding extended east to Beaumont and Port Arthur as Harvey slowly ambled east.
Making matters worse in Houston were the number of refineries and chemically contaminated “Superfund sites” that were inundated with flood water. While it is too soon to tell the economic, public health, and environmental costs of Harvey, it is likely that Harvey will rival some of the worst weather disasters in U.S. history.
What's better than a face full of snow? A dog with a face full of snow. Nice to see even the pups enjoying all this… https://t.co/yYmqdfMhlK12 minutes ago by WeatherNation
Starting to see some big-time snow totals in New York from today's lake effect event. Most of these reports are fro… https://t.co/VqH5eOgiVs8 hours ago by WeatherNation
Would you believe that Houston has had more snow than Milwaukee? Many southern cities are outpacing northern and we… https://t.co/XCJwMssXmb11 hours ago by WeatherNation
Blinding snowfall in Buffalo, NY Sunday as lake-effect squalls moved through. Some people even reported hearing thu… https://t.co/znxPlFMu7n12 hours ago by WeatherNation
WHITEOUT! Lake Effect Snow was in full force in Buffalo, NY today as fans braved the cold and snow! Bills took home… https://t.co/2MTyWant3o13 hours ago by WeatherNation
Warm to the west, cold to east. Here's what you can expect to see in your area to start off the workweek. https://t.co/kjoa3Aia2T13 hours ago by WeatherNation
HOLLY JOLLY! 🎄WHAT DO YOU THINK? Does it get any better than light snow falling on the Rockefellar Christmas Tree t… https://t.co/S1XRNPalRB14 hours ago by WeatherNation